Mountainsteward.net

What began as three separate trail design challenges ended with an unexpected conclusion: the future of Artists Bluff may not lie in choosing a single solution, but in combining several approaches into a small, interconnected trail system that better serves visitors while protecting the landscape.

From June 8-11, thirteen trail professionals from across the United States gathered in Franconia Notch State Park for the Artists Bluff Professional Development Workshop. Building on the success of the Franconia Ridge Loop Restoration Project, the workshop challenged participants to address one of New Hampshire’s most heavily visited recreation destinations using modern sustainable trail design principles.

The workshop was led by three professionals with decades of experience in trail planning, design, and construction. Peter Jensen, principal of Peter S. Jensen & Associates, has spent more than fifty years designing and building trails throughout the Northeast and is widely recognized as one of the region’s leading trail designers. Erin Amadon, owner of Town 4 Trail Services in Maine, has devoted more than two decades to trail construction, restoration, and professional training, helping advance sustainable trail-building practices across the region. Robert White, a New Hampshire landscape architect and WTN Americas project manager for the Franconia Ridge Restore the Ridge initiative in NH State Parks, brought extensive experience in trail planning, accessibility, and public landscape design.

Artists Bluff presents a growing management challenge. Thousands of visitors use the site each year, with use concentrated on a steep, eroded fall-line trail that was never designed to accommodate modern visitation levels. The result is a familiar set of problems: erosion, vegetation loss, crowding, safety concerns, informal trail creation, and increasing maintenance demands.

Rebuilding the Existing Trail

The first team was tasked with largely retaining the existing alignment of the Artists Bluff Trail while redesigning and rebuilding it using modern sustainable trail construction standards.

The goal was to improve resilience, visitor safety, and the trail’s ability to accommodate the thousands of hikers who visit the site each year while preserving the historic route familiar to generations of visitors. The resulting design incorporated advanced stone masonry, reverse-grade drainage, tread stabilization, and other techniques intended to create a highly resilient, low-maintenance trail capable of serving visitors for decades to come.

Creating a New Sustainable Alignment

The second team approached the challenge from a different perspective.

Rather than rebuilding the existing trail, participants explored opportunities to relocate the route away from the fall-line, where water naturally flows, and onto a more sustainable side-hill alignment following the contours of the landscape. By working with the mountain’s natural topography rather than against it, the design would significantly reduce erosion while creating a more durable and sustainable hiking experience.

Like the first alternative, this concept incorporated advanced stone masonry, reverse-grade drainage, and other contemporary trail-building techniques designed to minimize maintenance while maximizing longevity.

Designing an All-Persons Trail

The third team was asked to tackle perhaps the most ambitious challenge of all: designing a relocated trail that would meet sustainable trail standards while also functioning as an all-persons trail accessible to wheelchair users and others with mobility limitations.

While this approach eliminates the use of stone steps, it still relies upon sophisticated stonework, retaining structures, and drainage systems to ensure durability and long-term sustainability. The objective was not simply accessibility, but accessibility achieved through thoughtful design that remains compatible with the landscape and visitor experience.

Comparing the Alternatives

Each team produced detailed design plans and trail work logs identifying the structures, materials, and labor required for every section of trail. These work logs allowed participants to prepare preliminary cost estimates and compare the relative feasibility of the three approaches.

One of the workshop’s most significant findings was that all three alternatives proved more affordable than many participants had anticipated.

Each design successfully addressed concerns related to visitor capacity, resource protection, public safety, and visitor experience. All widened the trail to better accommodate two-way traffic. All incorporated modern reverse-grade drainage systems that generally require less maintenance than traditional waterbars. All emphasized aesthetics and sought to complement the distinctive character of Franconia Notch.

Beyond a Single Solution

Perhaps the most valuable outcome emerged during the final presentations and discussion.

Throughout the workshop, the three concepts had been treated as competing alternatives. Yet as participants evaluated the strengths and limitations of each approach, a different possibility began to emerge.

Rather than selecting a single design, participants recognized that the three concepts could potentially be combined into a small trail network featuring multiple loops, viewpoints, and recreational opportunities, including an accessible all-persons trail. Such an approach could disperse visitors across several routes, reducing congestion while offering a wider variety of recreational experiences.

At the same time, participants noted that if only one alternative were ultimately selected for implementation, the all-persons trail offered particularly compelling advantages. In addition to meeting modern standards for sustainable trail design and long-term durability, it would open one of New Hampshire’s most scenic and culturally significant destinations to a much broader segment of the public, including wheelchair users, families with mobility challenges, older visitors, and others who are currently unable to experience Artists Bluff. Expanding access to a place of such extraordinary beauty while simultaneously protecting its natural resources represents a powerful expression of what sustainable trail design can achieve.

Whether pursued as a network of trails or as a single project, the workshop demonstrated that thoughtful design can improve visitor experience, protect the landscape, and expand opportunities for people to connect with one of the White Mountains’ most beloved destinations.

Looking Ahead

We were fortunate to have representatives of the New Hampshire Division of Parks and Recreation present for the final presentations, including Jace Wirth, General Manager of Cannon Mountain and Franconia Notch State Park. Their participation helped ensure that the discussion remained grounded in practical management considerations, permitting requirements, operational realities, and long-term stewardship objectives.

The workshop also reinforced an important reality: good trail design alone does not build trails.

Implementation of any future improvements will depend on funding, partnerships, and public support. Over the past four years, WTN Americas and its partners have invested more than $500,000 in trail restoration projects within New Hampshire State Parks through private philanthropy. Those investments have helped advance major restoration efforts while demonstrating the important role private donors can play in protecting public lands. At the same time, federal and state investments remain essential to sustaining New Hampshire’s trail infrastructure and outdoor recreation economy.

The workshop did not produce a final plan for Artists Bluff. That was never its purpose. Instead, it brought together experienced trail professionals to explore possibilities, test ideas, and challenge assumptions.

What emerged was not a single answer, but a broader vision: a future in which sustainable trail design, accessibility, visitor experience, and resource protection are not competing goals, but complementary parts of a larger solution. For one week in June, Artists Bluff became a laboratory for that future.

Artists Bluff has become one of the defining trail-management challenges in the White Mountains. During peak foliage weekends, thousands of visitors crowd the short but steep trail to the famous overlook above Echo Lake. This week, a select group of thirteen trail professionals from across the United States gathered in Franconia Notch to explore what the future of the trail might look like.

The Artists Bluff Professional Development Workshop, sponsored by WTN Americas’ Alpine Stewardship Center in partnership with New Hampshire State Parks, began on Monday and continues through Thursday. The intensive four-day course brings together trail managers, land stewards, landscape architects, and trail builders from Texas, Maine, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, as well as representatives of the White Mountain National Forest, Appalachian Trail Conservancy, and the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests.

Artists Bluff brings a cautionary tale. Once a relatively quiet destination, it has become one of the most photographed locations in New Hampshire. Its popularity has also brought significant challenges. During peak periods, thousands of visitors may use the site in a single day, resulting in trail erosion, vegetation loss, crowding, safety concerns, sanitation issues, and a proliferation of informal trails. The steep fall-line trail, never designed for such levels of use, has deteriorated into an eroded corridor that struggles to accommodate modern visitation.

Leading the workshop are three professionals with decades of experience in trail design and construction. Peter Jensen, principal of Peter S. Jensen & Associates, has spent more than fifty years planning, building, and managing trails throughout the Northeast. Erin Amadon, owner of Town 4 Trail Services in Maine, has devoted more than two decades to trail construction and training, helping advance sustainable trail-building practices across the region. Robert White, a New Hampshire landscape architect and project manager for the Franconia Ridge Restore the Ridge initiative, brings extensive experience in trail planning, accessibility, and public landscape design.

The workshop’s centerpiece is a series of three design exercises intended to explore different approaches to the future of Artists Bluff. One team is examining how the existing fall-line trail could be reconstructed using modern sustainable trail design techniques while retaining the historic route to the greatest extent practical. A second team is scouting and laying out an entirely new trail alignment that could provide a more durable and resilient route to the overlook while reducing erosion and long-term maintenance concerns. A third team is pursuing perhaps the most ambitious challenge: designing a sustainable all-persons trail that would substantially expand accessibility while respecting the mountain’s terrain, scenery, and natural resources.

Participants include Erick Hetzel of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department; Tracy Arcella and Conor O’Brien of the Morris County Park Commission in New Jersey; Flor Escobar, landscape architect; Artie Hidalgo, professional trail builder; Tyler Fogg of Berkshire Natural Resources Council; Deanna Eastman and Nick Sindorf of the White Mountain National Forest; Stephanie Campbell and Leah Beck of the Appalachian Trail Conservancy; Andy Crowley of New Hampshire State Parks; Alicia van der Veur of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; and Dylan Summers of the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests.

Together, they represent a broad cross-section of the trail profession, bringing experience in trail planning, design, construction, stewardship, accessibility, and public land management from across the Northeast and beyond.

As the workshop continues, participants are refining alignments, measuring grades, identifying construction needs, developing cost estimates, and preparing conceptual plans for presentation on Thursday. Their findings will be compiled and shared with New Hampshire State Parks to help inform future planning discussions about Artists Bluff.

Whether any of the concepts developed this week ultimately move from drawing board to reality remains to be seen. What is certain is that the challenges facing Artists Bluff are not unique. Across New Hampshire and throughout North America, land managers are grappling with how to protect treasured landscapes while accommodating unprecedented levels of public use. For four days this June, Artists Bluff has become a field laboratory where experienced practitioners are exploring what the next generation of trail stewardship might look like.

As we complete the fourth year of the Partnership to Restore Franconia Ridge (third year for Pan American Trails/WTN Americas), it is increasingly clear that the existing federal funds will not support significant improvements to the Franconia Ridge Trail itself. ¹ The $1.125 million in federal money secured through the AMC with the help of Senator Shaheen will soon run out, and the private funds Pan American Trails/WTN Americas has raised are directed toward the Old Bridle Path and Falling Waters Trail in Franconia Notch State Park—below the alpine zone.

This project was named for Franconia Ridge and justified in part as a way to protect its fragile alpine area. Yet by improving the two main access trails, we risk funneling even more people into the alpine zone. Unless the USFS and Franconia Notch State Park take action to limit use, or we redesign the Ridge trail to accommodate current numbers, the alpine zone will deteriorate further.

A Trail Exceeding Capacity

The research and monitoring of Pan American Trails/WTN Americas Summit Stewards, students, and Trails Fellows show what many of us witness every weekend: Franconia Ridge is often well beyond capacity. Without the presence of stewards on the Ridge—both Pan American Trails/WTN Americas’ professionals and AMC’s volunteers—the alpine zone would be even more deteriorated. It is constant work—maintaining scree walls, piling brush and rubbling trampled areas, adding string fencing—that keeps most visitors on the trail. Thanks to this stewardship, we now see stabilized soils and revegetation in some areas.

Even if new policies reduced visitation by a third, the Ridge would still require weekly tending and a permanent steward presence.

What the Franconia Ridge Needs

We do need thoughtful tread reconstruction on Franconia Ridge, but it must be carefully tailored to the Ridge’s geology, ecology, and visitor behavior. The first step is a detailed inventory of places where off-trail behavior consistently occurs: narrow pinch points, sections with high rugosity (protruding rocks in the tread), high steps, steep grades, and unclear boundaries.

From there, we can apply our recognized toolbox of solutions—widening the trail, adding pullouts, removing obstacles in the tread, rebuilding steps, short relocations, rebuilding scree walls, and installing string fencing. This should happen over time, not all at once.

Who should do this work? Small alpine-experienced crews—two or three people who understand how hikers move through this terrain. Their work could proceed slowly, section by section, integrated with ongoing maintenance and adjusted as they see what succeeds and what fails. In this way, a consistent annual program of trail repair becomes part of the fabric of stewardship—like the Golden Gate Bridge, which is painted continuously, this work never finishes.

Even the best-built drystone scree walls on Franconia Ridge begin to fall apart almost immediately when knocked by hikers and runners. High-quality rock steps shift and become undermined in just a few years, succumbing to gravity and the impact of 45,000 visitors a season. Trail work must be revisited, repaired, and sometimes redesigned and adapted to new patterns of use.

Summit Stewards are uniquely positioned to play this role. They already devote less busy days to trail work. With additional training, stewards could tackle more technical projects, like rebuilding rock steps.

And of course, there is string fencing to replace, waterbars to clean, and signage to refresh. Stewards currently complement trail work with indirect management: providing information, education, and interpretation to visitors; conducting environmental and social monitoring; leading volunteers; and working closely with AMC Alpine Stewards and USFS Trailhead Stewards. All of this is coordinated with and overseen by the USFS. Trail-based management is further complemented by administrative policies such as potential visitor use limits, group-size limits, and parking/shuttle management in Franconia Notch State Park.

Taken together, this is integrated trail management: trail tending.

The Limits of “Big Project, Big Funding”

This vision stands in contrast to the recent model of massive, multi-crew projects focused only on trail reconstruction. The Crawford Path project and the current Franconia Ridge partnership exemplify this “big project, big funding” approach. While it may sustain large trail departments, the results are mixed: work quality varies, and when the money runs out, crews disappear—finished or not. Worse, it feeds what I call the engineer’s conceit: the idea that if you just build a trail “right,” the job is done.

Good engineering and design do matter—Inca stonework in South America has endured for a thousand years, a testament to what careful construction can achieve. But no trail, however well built, is ever truly “finished.” Every trail requires constant revisiting, with regular maintenance, and adjustment and adaptation over time as climate and use patterns change. One reason so many White Mountain trails are in poor condition is that trail maintenance has been segregated from trail construction and reconstruction and treated as second-class work, rather than as the heart of stewardship.

The Role of Summit Stewards

Nearly five years ago, when “restoration” funds for the Franconia Ridge Loop first appeared, the Summit Steward program was excluded from sharing in the grant—because at the time the USFS and AMC did not consider stewardship “tread work.” I believed then, and still believe now, that this was a mistake. Over the four years of the partnership, it is Summit Stewards and volunteers who have in fact done the only tread work on the Franconia Ridge Trail itself.

Thankfully, the USFS has come to recognize this and has increased its funding for the Summit Steward program. The Waterman Fund has been a consistent supporter. Even so, it remains a struggle to find enough funds to keep Summit Stewards on Franconia Ridge every year.

Looking Forward

As the Partnership to Restore Franconia Ridge Loop winds down, we should not be chasing ever-larger grants to stage logistically complex projects that vanish when the money dries up. Instead, let’s invest in a dedicated cohort of specially trained Summit Stewards—small, skilled teams who can continually rebuild, adapt, and maintain the Franconia Ridge Trail.

The alpine zone demands nothing less.

1. The Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC) professional crew did some excellent work building scree wall and and cairns on the summit of Lafayette and on the upper Greenleaf Trail, and recently an AMC led Vermont Youth Conservation Corp crew did equally high-quality work on the upper Greenleaf Trail. But no work has gone beyond the summit of Lafayette on the Franconia Ridge itself. ↩︎

From the September 3, 2025 issue of the Raven

A Chance Encounter

The Navier–Stokes equations are the fundamental mathematical description of how fluids (like air or water) move, capturing the balance between inertia, pressure, viscosity, and external forces. That question encouraged me to pull together a few ideas I’ve been developing over the decade and consider how this analogy might help us build a model for off-trail surges on Franconia Ridge.

Fluid Dynamics as Analogy

The Navier–Stokes equation can be a surprisingly useful analogy for hiker flow. At its core, fluid dynamics helps us think about how many individual “particles” moving together generate collective patterns like laminar flow, turbulence, eddies, and surges. Those patterns map well onto what we see on high-use trails: smooth movement when hikers are well spaced, congestion when they bunch up, and sudden bursts of off-trail departures when local density rises too high.

From Pipes, to Arteries, to Rivers

Pipes are rigid: too much pressure and they burst, too little and they collapse (Venturi effect). This is a binary, mechanical mode of failure — the pipe is intact, or it has catastrophically failed.

Arteries are elastic: adaptive, but also prone to nonlinear thresholds. Turbulence interacts with narrowing walls, so small changes in flow can lead to sudden constriction or occlusion. This resembles the way off-trail departures spike once density passes a tipping point (Lee et al., 2012).

Rivers are adaptive: porous banks allow flow to respond to terrain, and excess volume produces meanders and braids. Trails behave the same way: instead of bursting, they widen and braid under pressure (Wimpey & Marion, 2010).

Thresholds and Nonlinear Dynamics on Franconia Ridge

Field observations align with this systems view. On busy weekends, the sequence:

→ A morning wave of hikers enters the loop, creating a density surge that moves across the Ridge like a flood pulse → At first, flow remains laminar: hikers stay mostly on-trail → Once a density threshold is exceeded, behavior changes suddenly: hikers step off to pass, to rest, or to avoid crowds → Off-trail departures spike nonlinearly, resembling a bifurcation event (Helbing et al., 2000) → Impacts grow disproportionately: a modest increase in hikers per hour results in a dramatic rise in trampling and braiding.

This is the hallmark of a complex adaptive system. Like turbulence in arteries or overbank flooding in rivers, trail impacts emerge abruptly once thresholds are crossed.

Using Agent-Based Modeling to Anticipate Outcomes

Because averages obscure these nonlinear spikes, managers need modeling approaches that capture thresholds and feedback. Agent-based modeling (ABM) offers a promising tool.

How it works: each hiker is modeled as an “agent” with simple rules — walking speed, group size, comfort with crowding, probability of stepping off-trail under certain densities or slopes.

Wave dynamics: by varying start times at trailheads, the model can simulate the morning “pulse” of hikers moving across the Ridge, showing when and where local densities approach critical thresholds.

Threshold behaviors: ABM has already been used in visitor management for protected areas (Štekerová et al., 2022) and in crowd science to capture nonlinear “panic” or “jam” effects (Helbing et al., 2000). Similar approaches have shown how social groupings change crowd flow (Moussaïd et al., 2010) and how physiological factors shape pedestrian trajectories (Narang et al., 2015).

Testing interventions: scenarios can be run for permit or timed-entry systems, steward placement at key “eddies,” trail design changes, or communication tools like signage and steward contact.

This mirrors river management, where levees, diversions, and floodplains work together. It also reflects physiology, where resilience depends on both vessel walls and regulatory signals.

A Systemic View of the Loop

The river analogy encourages managers to take a whole-system view of the Franconia Ridge loop:

Inputs: parking, shuttles, and trailhead access determine the size and timing of the hiker “wave.”

Regulation: permits, timed-entry systems, shuttle timing can flatten the morning surge, lowering the chance of threshold crossing. 

Trail design: side-hill alignment, wider trails, scree walls, string fencing.

Local controls: stewards act as “regulators,” dampening turbulence at critical points and educating visitors.

Above treeline, where realignment away from fall-line routes may not be feasible, these systemic and social interventions are crucial to protecting the three miles of alpine zone on the Franconia Ridge Loop that are most at risk.

Conclusion

Trails behave less like pipes waiting to burst and more like rivers whose channels expand and braid under pressure. The artery analogy reminds us why thresholds matter: small changes can trigger nonlinear shifts with outsized impacts.

By adopting this systemic, nonlinear perspective, managers can better anticipate surges, identify bifurcation points, and deploy layered interventions. This is the essence of Integrated Trail Management (ITM): combining design, education, regulation, and stewardship to create resilience in the face of growing use.

Just as rivers are managed through levees, diversions, and floodplains, and arteries rely on both vessel strength and systemic regulation, Franconia Ridge can be managed through a mix of direct and indirect tools. The goal is not to eliminate flow, but to channel it wisely, preserving fragile alpine ecosystems.

Looking ahead, agent-based modeling (ABM) can help managers simulate how hikers move across the Ridge, anticipate where thresholds are crossed, and test interventions virtually before applying them on the ground. By linking trail design, administrative tools (permits, timed entry, shuttle schedules), and policy measures (group size limits, steward placement) into a single systemic framework, ABM provides a way to identify the most effective combinations. In this way, science, design, and governance reinforce one another — giving us a path toward both protecting the alpine zone and sustaining the experience of those who visit it.

References

Cole, D.N. (1995). Experimental trampling of vegetation: Predictors of resistance and resilience. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 215–224.

Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2000). Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 407, 487–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/35035023

Marion, J.L. (2016). A review and synthesis of recreation ecology research supporting carrying capacity and visitor use management decisionmaking. Journal of Forestry, 114(3), 339–351.

Marion, J.L., Park, L.O., & Wimpey, J. (2022). Efficacy of Combining Education and Site Management in Reducing Off-Trail Travel in a Fragile Biotic Community, Acadia National Park. Journal of Interpretation Research, 28(1), 26–45.

Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2010). The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PLoS One, 5(4), e10047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010047

Narang, S., Best, A., Curtis, S., & Manocha, D. (2015). Generating pedestrian trajectories consistent with the fundamental diagram based on physiological and psychological factors. PLoS One, 10(4), e0117856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117856

Park, L.O., Manning, R.E., Marion, J.L., Lawson, S.R., & Jacobi, C. (2008). Managing visitor impacts in parks: A multi-method study of the effectiveness of alternative management practices. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26(1), 97–121.

Rupf, R., Haegeli, P., Karlen, B., & Wyttenbach, M. (2019). Does Perceived Crowding Cause Winter Backcountry Recreationists to Displace? Mountain Research and Development, 39(1), R60.

Štekerová, K., Zelenka, J., & Kořínek, M. (2022). Agent-Based Modelling in Visitor Management of Protected Areas. Sustainability, 14(19), 11853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911853

Lee, J., Nemati, S., Silva, I., Edwards, B.A., Butler, J.P., & Malhotra, A. (2012). Transfer entropy estimation and directional coupling change detection in biomedical time series. Biomedical Engineering Online, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-11-19

Wimpey, J., & Marion, J.L. (2010). The influence of use, environmental and managerial factors on the width of recreational trails. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(9), 2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.017

“To begin with oneself, but not to end with oneself; to start from oneself, but not to aim at oneself; to comprehend oneself, but not to be preoccupied with oneself.”
— Martin Buber

Jess and Demi’s reports and photos from last weekend on Franconia Ridge left me disheartened. Graffiti on rocks and ledges, an abandoned tent in the alpine zone, the usual overcrowded summits—and then, astonishingly, someone who had hauled a rowing machine to the ridge. Taken together, these images left me stunned. I try to recognize that people experience and enjoy the outdoors in different ways—often very different from what I would choose. But the risk in sliding too far into relativism is that we lose our ethical grounding.

Aldo Leopold offers one of the simplest and most direct definitions of ethics: 

“All ethics so far evolved rest upon a single premise: that the individual is a member of a community of interdependent parts. His instincts prompt him to compete for his place in that community, but his ethics prompt him also to cooperate…”

In one of the graffiti scrawls I saw the words “Only me.” Whether that was what the author intended to write, it seemed fitting: a declaration of narcissism. In a world of “only me,” there is no community, no sense of responsibility, no ethics.

Leopold believed ethics can and must expand beyond human-to-human relations: “The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: the land.”

To stand on Franconia Ridge is to recognize and respect not just the thousands of fellow hikers, but also the alpine plants, the ravens and other wildlife, the thin, fragile soils, the brooks and streams rushing down into the Pemigewasset Wilderness. All are part of our community.

Trophies

Leopold also spoke of a conservation “esthetic,” the idea that recreation in nature could cultivate deeper values. He discussed how seeking “trophies” can connect people to the land. He distinguished between direct and indirect trophies.

A direct trophy is something extracted from the land—antlers, a trout, a pressed flower. This can be sustainable when taken sparingly, but they consume what they commemorate. By contrast, an indirect trophy—a photograph, a field sketch, a journal entry—leaves the land intact. For Leopold, indirect trophies marked a step toward ethical maturity: they satisfied the desire for memory while protecting the resource.

But on Franconia Ridge today, indirect trophies are no longer harmless. The summit selfie, once a private snapshot, has become a mass ritual. The “4000 Footer” list turns a personal memory into a public badge, fueling competition and overrunning some fragile summits just because they have surpassed an elevational threshold. Social media magnifies the effect: a single TikTok or YouTube of someone rowing on Franconia Ridge or posing in an alpine meadow can summon hundreds of imitators. The land is not consumed by the photo itself, but by the trampling, crowding, and performance required to produce it.

From I–It to I–Thou

Direct or indirect, trophies reduce nature to an object that we stand apart from, connected only in a utilitarian way. We press the flower, post the photo—each becomes something we possess rather than a relationship we enter into. This is what the philosopher Martin Buber warned against in his description of the I–It relationship, where others we encounter in the world—whether part of the natural world or people—are reduced to objects for our use.

A land ethic, by contrast, draws us into what Buber called the I–Thou relationship—an encounter rooted in reciprocity and respect, where soils, waters, plants, and animals are not “its” but fellow members of a shared community. Here the flower is left to bloom, the photograph held as a reminder rather than a badge. The experience is not about possession, but about participation in a living whole.

We

Leopold hoped that indirect trophies might nurture a conservation ethic, cultivating appreciation that deepens our connection to land. For us, the task is to rediscover that possibility in a digital era where images multiply endlessly and summit challenges have become part of our outdoor culture. Could the 4000-footer traditions—in all their variations, from winter ascents to the Direttissima—be embraced not only as personal achievements, but also as pathways to deeper care for the mountains themselves? Could photos be gestures of reverence as much as a celebration of achievement? Could our stories and records highlight the alpine community that makes these places so meaningful?

Sometimes the most ethical choice lies not in what we do, but in what we refrain from doing. Restraining the impulse to claim a trophy—whether it is a photograph, a peak, or a list completed—can be a gesture of respect when we recognize that our action might cause harm. At times, deciding not to climb or run an already overburdened summit may be the wisest course. In the same way, choosing not to post a photo or video on social media—resisting the pull of performance—can itself be an ethical act, a gesture of humility toward both the land and our human community.

The graffiti on Franconia Ridge reminds us of what is at stake. To move from “Only me” to “we” is to recognize that Franconia Ridge is not a stage for performance, but a living community—one to which we belong, and for which we share responsibility.

Selected Bibliography

Leopold, Aldo.

• A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press, 1949.
   —Seminal collection of essays in which Leopold articulates his concept of a “land ethic,” calling for a responsible relationship between people and the land they inhabit.

Buber, Martin.

• I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufmann, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1970. Originally published as Ich und Du, 1923.
   —Foundational philosophical work exploring the nature of relationships, particularly the contrast between “I–It” (objectifying) and “I–Thou” (relational) modes of being.

Additional Resources

• Flader, Susan L. Thinking Like a Mountain: Aldo Leopold and the Evolution of an Ecological Attitude toward Deer, Wolves, and Forests. University of Wisconsin Press, 1994.
  
• Friedman, Maurice S. Martin Buber: The Life of Dialogue. University of Chicago Press, 2002.
  

Published in the June 3, 2025 issue off the Raven

A few years later, as a college student in the 1970s, I was among the first to be hired by the WVAIA to lead trail work. That same year, a young U.S. Forest Service forest technician named Dave Hyrdlika was assigned to trail duty for the Pemigewasset Ranger District. It was Dave’s first season “on the Forest.” Back then, trail work wasn’t a specialized position—“technician” was a general term for someone who did a little of everything. Dave was trained as a forester, and trails were new to him.

On our first day working together we reviewed the South Tripyramid Loop Trail with the retiring forester who had been uncharge of trails. It had serious erosion problems. I was confident I knew what the trail needed—after all, I had a handful of years working under WVAIA trail masters. I knew how to build a log waterbar, and enthusiastically proposed one after another as we walked up the long approach to the South Slide, an old logging road. Dave was more cautious, and the retiring forester simply said, “Wait. Let’s see what’s ahead.”

We walked for nearly a mile. I kept proposing waterbars. The retiring forester kept saying, “Wait.” Finally, near the base of the South Slide, we came upon a massive stormwater drainage that had once crossed the trail but was now blocked by silt and rocks, diverting water directly down the trail tread. The real problem wasn’t a lack of waterbars—it was a blocked cross-drain.

On the way back down, we did plan a few waterbars, but the key intervention was to dig out the drainage and redirect the stormwater off the trail. That became our project for the summer. We excavated a channel rather than construct the dozens of waterbars I had envisioned.

It was an unforgettable moment. My understanding of trail work was upended. I had learned one simple engineering trick and was eager to apply it everywhere. As the saying goes, “If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”

Law of the Hammer

This “law of the hammer” reveals a common tendency in engineering and thinking: once we have a useful tool or concept, we try to apply it everywhere. We force the landscape to fit our tools, and we interpret problems through the lens of what we already know. This demonstrates both the power of accumulated knowledge—techniques that work well in the right context—and the limits of seeing the world only through preconceived solutions.

The retiring forester brought something else to the trail: a beginner’s mind. He suspended judgment. He stopped being an expert, at least for the moment. He walked, watched, and listened. Dave, with greater humility than I had at the time, took his lead.

Over the years, as I continued to lead crews in Waterville and Dave advanced into a trail specialist role with the Forest Service, we became friends and learned together. During that period I helped founded the Sandwich Range Conservation Association (SRCA), a shared trail crew crew between trail clubs in the Sandwich Range. I eventually moved to Costa Rica and raised a family. Dave retired early from the Forest Service and pursued his passion for homebrewing beer. Though trail work was no longer my vocation, it remained my avocation—as it still is today.

Becoming an Experienced Beginner

What I gained in those early years—and in the years since—is experience: I’ve seen the long-term effects of my own work. I’ve returned to trails I helped maintain and observed whether our techniques succeeded in controlling erosion. I’ve come to see trails as dynamic systems shaped by geology, soil, slope, aspect, elevation, weather, climate, and fauna—but most of all, by people. And while the foundational components of a trail remain the same, two variables have been changing rapidly: people and climate. Increased visitation and more frequent, intense rain events have accelerated erosion and introduced new environmental challenges.

Over time, I learned new techniques and adopted new tools. I came to love the rock bar and eventually mastered the grip hoist for moving large stones. Watching my wooden waterbars and soil retainers disintegrate after just a few seasons, I began favoring stone for erosion control. With this shift, the rock bar became my new hammer—once again, I had to remind myself not to treat every trail as a puzzle of stones waiting to be moved and set.

The most important and difficult lesson in trail work, I’ve come to believe, is balancing growing expertise with a beginner’s mind. I strive to be an experienced beginner.

Bricolage and the Yankee Farmer

This approach reminds me of what anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss called bricolage—a creative process in which one solves problems using whatever tools or ideas are at hand, rather than relying on specialized equipment or formal plans. The bricoleur improvises, adapting to the situation with available resources, in contrast to the engineer who follows a structured design toward a defined goal.

The stereotypical Yankee farmer is a kind of cultural cousin to the bricoleur: solving problems with ingenuity and reuse, building what’s needed from what’s nearby. It’s a mindset shaped not by abstract calculation but by practical imagination and constraint.

Law of the Pick-Mattock

In trail tending, it’s best to have at least one versatile tool. The pick-mattock—part pick that can be used for prying rock and breaking up hard-packed soil, part mattock for digging and grubbing—is one such tool. It’s not precise, but it’s adaptable. While the engineer reaches for the exact tool calibrated for a single task, the bricoleur reaches for the pick-mattock: a tool of possibility.

The pick-mattock doesn’t dictate a singular use; it invites improvisation. In contrast to the law of the hammer, which reduces all problems to one kind of solution, the law of the pick-mattock embraces the creative potential of what’s at hand—even when it’s heavy, blunt, or uneven. It’s not the tool that defines the task, but the task that reveals how the tool might serve.

Of course, there are times when we need specialized tools and precise engineering. The law of the pick-mattock doesn’t exclude the use of hammers, rock bars, grip hoists—or even rock drills. It’s always a matter of balance: knowing when to improvise, when to standardize, and when to observe before acting. I would argue that the best engineers develop the quality of being experienced beginners.

Looking Ahead

White Mountain trails are in crisis. Use is rising, storms are harsher, and the public systems once tasked with caring for trails are themselves eroding—funding cut, staff reduced. Increasingly, work is carried out by nonprofits and volunteers, piecing together financial and volunteer resources as they can. In this shifting landscape, we need not just plans and precision, but improvisation. We need more bricoleurs—more Yankee farmers—making do with what’s at hand, guided by care, memory, and ingenuity.

Published in the Raven, June 25, 2025

Photo above by Jessica Jagger, Saturday, June 21, 2025

On Saturday, June 21, Pan American Trails Summit Steward Jessica Jagger personally counted 936 visitors traversing Franconia Ridge, making it one of the highest single-day counts. Since she took a lunch break from, the actual number likely surpassed 1,000.

For context, between early July and mid September in 2024, only four days exceeded 900 visitors. Ten years earlier, in 2014, that level of traffic occurred just once. That’s a 300% increase. Similarly, days exceeding 500 hikers more than doubled in the past decade—from 9 in 2014 to 19 in 2024, a 111% increase. These figures point to an unmistakable trend: growing visitation pressure on the Franconia Ridge alpine zone.  

Data sources:
2014 trail counts from Reigner, N., Valliere, W., Kiewra, L., Perry, E., & Manning, R. (2017). Monitoring and evaluating indicators of recreational quality on the White Mountain National Forest. 2024 trail counts from the WMNF electronic trail counter on Franconia Ridge.

The graphs above represents just a portion of the season. In 2024, we saw one additional 1,000+ visitor day in October. Between late May and early October 2024, total visitation reached a little over 45,000—up 12.5% from 40,000 in 2023.

As we’ve often noted in The Raven, the total number of visitors in a day or season is less important than visitor passes per hour at specific sections of trail in the alpine zone—that is, the density of people present on the alpine zone at any one time. If we graph this, we see waves or surges of hikers moving past trail counters. This pattern emerges because most visitors begin their hikes or runs within a 3-hour morning window.

When Does Crowd Become Impact?

Last year, White Mountain Environmental Field School student Ally Hollywood monitored off-trail behavior at specific sites. When compared with trail counter data, she noticed that off-trail activity surged once visitor density reached a certain threshold. This suggests a nonlinear relationship: off-trail behavior doesn’t increase steadily with visitor numbers. Instead, it stays relatively low—until a “bifurcation event” occurs, when behavior abruptly shifts. We’ve described these in the past as “chaos moments” on the Ridge.

These are preliminary observations. In 2025, we plan to repeat Ally’s study and refine our methods.

Why Some Spots Are Worse Than Others

While off-trail surges are clearly linked to crowding, their intensity varies along different sections of the Ridge. One reason is the trail’s physical characteristics. Ally observed that sections with unclear trail boundaries or many protruding rocks (high rugosity) had significantly more off-trail movement.

Fellow student Ian Skinner identified three trail characteristics that influence off-trail behavior. Adding Ally’s two, we have :

• Trail width – Wider trails (over 4 feet) reduce off-trail movement.
• Step height – High steps (over 8 inches) often prompt users to walk around.
• Trail grade – The ideal grade is 10%. Braided sections often exceed 35%.
• Surface roughness – Trails with uneven, protruding rocks increase detours.
• Trail boundary definition – Clear edges (e.g., scree walls) reduce wandering.

What We Can Do

These observations point to two major direct management interventions:

1. Reducing Crowding

To avoid threshold conditions that lead to bifurcation events, timed entry or staggered access may help. For example, staggering shuttle departures to the Old Bridle Path trailhead could space out hiking groups.

2. Trail Tending and Redesign

• Maintain scree walls and use string fencing strategically
• Widen trails (to ~ 5 feet) to allow passing without stepping off the trail
• Remove protruding rocks where feasible
• Rebuild high steps to be more accessible
• Address trail grade where possible—steep gradients will likely remain due to constraints in the alpine zone, where relocations are unlikely

We hope dialogue between Franconia Notch State Park and the USFS continues to explore timed entry or other strategies to manage crowding on Franconia Ridge.

Combining Direct and Indirect Management

Beyond physical interventions, Summit and Alpine Stewards play a crucial indirect management role through education and interpretation—both in person and via signage. In 2025, the White Mountain Environmental Field School will revamp signage and messaging on the Ridge, incorporating our new mascots, Ravens Franc and Connie, created by 2024 student Declan Buckley.

Finally, we’ll launch photopoint monitoring at select alpine sites, based on work initiated by 2024 student Anya Salters. These photo comparisons over time will help assess which management approaches—direct or indirect—are most effective on Franconia Ridge.

Select References

Wimpey, J. F., & Marion, J. L. (2010). Visitor use and trail width in Acadia National Park.

Leung, Y.-F., & Marion, J. L. (1996). Recreation ecology: The ecological impact of outdoor recreation. USDA Forest Service.

Marion, J. L., & Wimpey, J. (2017). Sustainable trail design and soil loss dynamics.

Marion, J. L. (2024). Recreation Ecology Guidance for Campsite and Trail Monitoring and Visitor Use Management. Virginia Tech.

The community camp should become something more than a mere ‘playground’: it should stimulate every line of outdoor non-industrial endeavor. Summer schools or seasonal field courses could be established and scientific travel courses organized and accommodated in the different communities along the trail…

Why not raise food, as well as consume it, on the cooperative plan? Food and farm camps should come about as a natural sequence… Here in the same spirit of cooperation and well-ordered action, the food and crops consumed in the outdoor living would as far as practicably be sown and harvested.

—Benton MacKaye, An Appalachian Trail: A Project in Regional Planning, Journal of the American Institute of Architects, Oct. 1921

Since the late 1980s, Sandwich Mountain Farm¹ in Sandwich Notch has served as a basecamp for trail crews and a site for study and international cultural exchange. Visitors have always had the opportunity to help out in a food-producing garden on the farm. In 2006, we began sharing a community garden space with neighbors and trail crews alike, under the name Curious Gourds, in memory and honor of Margret and H.A. Rey. What were once informal discussions around the fire have evolved into a college semester field course, and occasional visits from international colleagues have become a formal Pan American Trails Fellowship program. This integration of trails, cooperative living, study, and food production that we have practiced for nearly 40 years is directly inspired by Benton MacKaye, the visionary founder of the Appalachian Trail.

Benton MacKaye’s Vision for Living Differently

What Are Community Camps?

MacKaye envisioned community camps as small, cooperatively managed communities nestled within the Appalachian landscape, serving as sanctuaries from urban industrial life. These camps were not designed as temporary recreation sites, but as permanent, self-governing communities organized around shared values of cooperation, education, recuperation, and outdoor work.

Each camp would:

• Occupy a fixed site (with no land speculation or private real estate development),
• Offer simple dwellings and shared amenities,
• Be accessible to people of modest means—without profit motive,
• Host field schools, study programs, and restorative retreats for workers, educators, and families.

These communities were to be intentionally limited in size to prevent overcrowding and preserve the surrounding landscape. MacKaye emphasized that rather than build ever-larger camps, more camps should be created across the region.

The Role of Food and Farm Camps

More than recreational retreats, food and farm camps were part of a broader solution to what MacKaye called “the problem of living”— shaped by economic hardship, crowded cities, and growing disconnection from the land.

In food and farm camps people could grow food, harvest timber, and meet the material needs of the trail and community. These were not romantic throwbacks to subsistence farming, but practical, communal responses to economic insecurity and social fragmentation of the time.

Food and timber production would:

• Support trail users and nearby communities directly,
• Provide new models of dignified, land-based employment,
• Foster stewardship of soil, water, and forest rather than extraction.

MacKaye pointed to early examples like the Hudson Guild Farm in New Jersey and Camp Tamiment in Pennsylvania, both rooted in cooperative labor and rural revitalization.

A Broader Vision

In today’s world—marked by climate change, inequality, and discord—MacKaye’s vision feels prescient. While the community and farm camp vision remains an underdeveloped idea in the trails world, it offers a compelling model of resilient, cooperative living grounded in land, purpose, and care.

Sandwich Mountain Farm and Pan American Trails

Today, Sandwich Mountain Farm hosts a small seasonal community of trail stewards, undergraduate and graduate students, Pan American Trails Fellows, and other visiting trails professionals—who tend trails, grow food together, study and share in a rhythm of daily life. In spirit and practice, this echoes MacKaye’s vision for farm camps—rooted in companionship, labor, and stewardship.

This vision now extends far beyond the Appalachian Mountains. As a designated Pan American Trails Center, the White Mountains connect to a larger hemispheric movement. For many years WTN Americas has organized trails programs in rural Costa Rica. In 2025, the Pan American Trails Network is launching a new field school in the Tropical Andes of Ecuador, linking highland communities and biodiversity corridors through trail-based capacity building. These field schools, rooted in local culture and ecology, are part of a growing network of place-based learning sites inspired by MacKaye’s original vision and adapted to the diverse landscapes of the Americas.

Seen is this light, Sandwich Mountain Farm, the White Mountain Environmental Field School, and the Pan American Trails Fellowship program are more than local experiments. They are nodes in a continental system of learning and stewardship, demonstrating how trails can be corridors of both ecological and social restoration—where, alongside recreation and conservation, people grow food, share knowledge, and rebuild community.

A century after MacKaye’s call, we hope that through examples like Sandwich Mountain Farm and networks like Pan American Trails, community and farm camps will be more than a historical footnote—they will become a real and shared project of ecological and social renewal, from the mountains of New Hampshire to the highlands of the Andes, and beyond.

1. In 1992, Nevin and Mary Scrimshaw donated a conservation easement on this property to the United States Forest Service. The easement prohibits subdivision and real estate development, and dedicates the land to farming, forestry, recreation, education, and renewable energy. Jenny Rowe and Nat Scrimshaw homesteaded here in the late 1980s and named their project Sandwich Mountain Farm. The property, held in trust, is surrounded by the White Mountain National Forest and is close to the Sandwich Range Wilderness, part of the National Wilderness Preservation System.. ↩︎

About the artwork and artist featured in this essay

Since 1933, except for a brief period of war service in a Providence shipyard, Herbert and Bertha Waters made their home in New Hampshire. Waters lived in Warner, NH as an artist and art teacher from 1936 to 1941 in the Works Progress Administration’s Federal Art Project. Later, he taught at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, at Holderness School in Plymouth, and at Alderson-Broaddus College in Phillipi, West Virginia.

Throughout a long career, Waters continued to refine his printmaking techniques, especially in wood engraving, and to explore the intimate and grand landscapes of New Hampshire from his home in Campton, NH. He completed his last engravings from 1992 to 1993. Waters died in Campton, New Hampshire, in 1996.